| Details |
Summary of Technical and Commercial Evaluation
of
Project Implementation and Supervision Consultant
G 0377-AFG (Tranche 5)
On 20 March 2014, Consulting Services Recruitment Notice (CSRN) was published on ADB Consultant Management System (CMS) website.
a request to submit EOIs for the project. Upon deadline of EOI submission on 12 May 2014, the following EOIs were received, evaluation points that each EOI has received is indicated in the table below:
|
Rank
|
Point
|
Firm
|
Country
|
|
1
|
85.5
|
Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG
|
Germany
|
|
2
|
83.1
|
Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.
|
Korea, Republic of
|
|
3
|
76.6
|
SMEC International Pty. Ltd.
|
Australia
|
|
4
|
73.8
|
SM Developers
|
India
|
|
5
|
68.1
|
Pakistan Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.
|
Pakistan
|
|
6
|
62.2
|
Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.
|
Pakistan
|
|
7
|
62.1
|
GFA Consulting Ltd.
|
Afghanistan
|
|
8
|
62.0
|
e.Gen consultants Ltd.
|
Bangladesh
|
|
9
|
61.8
|
Societe General de Surviellance SA
|
Switzerland
|
|
10
|
61.8
|
Unicon (UK) Limited
|
United Kingdome
|
|
11
|
61.1
|
Vision RI Connexion Services Pvt. Ltd.
|
India
|
|
12
|
60.5
|
Synergic Hydro (India) Pvt. Ltd.
|
India
|
|
13
|
58.4
|
Environment and Resources Management Services
|
Nepal
|
|
14
|
52.8
|
Advanced Engineering Associates International Inc.
|
USA
|
|
15
|
49.4
|
Islamic Countries Business Council
|
Pakistan
|
|
16
|
44.7
|
OMIC Tashkent LLC
|
Uzbekistan
|
|
17
|
31.0
|
RTS Global Consulting LLC
|
USA
|
|
18
|
19.0
|
Invedyn LLC
|
USA
|
The selection method has been announced as quality and cost based selection (QCBS). After evaluation of EOIs, the six consultants who obtained high EOI scores were shortlisted for further process:
After approval of long list to shortlist report approved, The RFP was sent to all shortlisted consultants on 01 March 2015, calling for full technical and financial proposals. Upon proposal submission deadline on 18 May 2015, the following consultants submitted their technical and financial proposals. The financial proposals remained sealed and unopened:
|
No.
|
Firm Name
|
Country of Origin
|
|
1
|
Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG
|
Germany
|
|
2
|
Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.
|
Korea, Republic of
|
|
3
|
SMEC International Pty. Ltd.
|
Australia
|
|
4
|
SM Developers
|
India
|
|
5
|
Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.
|
Pakistan
|
After the evaluation of Technical Proposals, each technical proposal was scored against categories already defined in the RFP, such as, consultant’s qualification, approach and methodology and proposed International and National key experts, table below indicates technical points that each proposal has received:
|
No.
|
Firm Name
|
Country of Origin
|
Technical Score
|
|
1
|
Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG
|
Germany
|
856.2
|
|
2
|
Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.
|
Korea, Republic of
|
868.1
|
|
3
|
SMEC International Pty. Ltd.
|
Australia
|
855.4
|
|
4
|
SM Developers
|
India
|
770.6
|
|
5
|
Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.
|
Pakistan
|
757
|
After Technical Evaluation Report has been approved, the price opening took place on 10 October 2015, and the prices of the five consulting firms were recorded:
|
No.
|
Firm Name
|
Country of Origin
|
Price at Opening (US$ Equivalent)
|
|
1
|
Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG
|
Germany
|
2,167,994
|
|
2
|
Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.
|
Korea, Republic of
|
2,250,275
|
|
3
|
SMEC International Pty. Ltd.
|
Australia
|
2,251,650
|
|
4
|
SM Developers
|
India
|
2,091,835
|
|
5
|
Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.
|
Pakistan
|
2,185,840
|
In the commercial evaluation, the prices have been adjusted due to arithmetical corrections, adjustment due to missing or reduced/increased items, the adjusted price for each proposal is determined:
|
No.
|
Firm Name
|
Adjusted Price (US$ Equivalent)
|
Price Score
|
|
1
|
Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG
|
2,167,994
|
960
|
|
2
|
Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.
|
2,250,222
|
921
|
|
3
|
SMEC International Pty. Ltd.
|
2,251,650
|
920
|
|
4
|
SM Developers
|
2,091,846
|
1000
|
|
5
|
Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.
|
2,185,840
|
951
|
Quality Cost ratio as described in the RFP is (technical: 0.9, price: 0.1), technical and price points and total evaluated points for each proposal is illustrated in the table below:
|
No.
|
Firm Name
|
Technical Points
|
Price Points
|
Total Points
|
Ranking
|
|
a
|
b
|
c = 0.9 x tech. score
|
d = 0.1 x price score
|
e = 3+4
|
f
|
|
1
|
Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG
|
770.62
|
96.03
|
866.65
|
2
|
|
2
|
Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.
|
781.25
|
92.08
|
873.34
|
1
|
|
3
|
SMEC International Pty. Ltd.
|
769.87
|
92.02
|
861.89
|
3
|
|
4
|
SM Developers
|
693.53
|
100.00
|
793.53
|
4
|
|
5
|
Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.
|
681.26
|
95.14
|
776.40
|
5
|
|
