Welcome to DABS Website

DABS
 
GO BACK

Project Implementation and Supervision Consultant G 0377-AFG (Tranche 5)


 
Description Project Implementation and Supervision Consultant G 0377-AFG (Tranche 5)
Attachments 75469cba5fc4c6ca7cecc79aa5dfcc54.pdf
Publish Date 2016-07-04
Details

Summary of Technical and Commercial Evaluation

of

Project Implementation and Supervision Consultant

G 0377-AFG (Tranche 5)

 

 

On 20 March 2014, Consulting Services Recruitment Notice (CSRN) was published on ADB Consultant Management System (CMS) website.

a request to submit EOIs for the project. Upon deadline of EOI submission on 12 May 2014, the following EOIs were received, evaluation points that each EOI has received is indicated in the table below:

 

Rank

Point

Firm

Country

1

85.5

Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG

Germany

2

83.1

Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.

Korea, Republic of

3

76.6

SMEC International Pty. Ltd.

Australia

4

73.8

SM Developers

India

5

68.1

Pakistan Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.

Pakistan

6

62.2

Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.

Pakistan

7

62.1

GFA Consulting Ltd.

Afghanistan

8

62.0

e.Gen consultants Ltd.

Bangladesh

9

61.8

Societe General de Surviellance SA

Switzerland

10

61.8

Unicon (UK) Limited

United Kingdome

11

61.1

Vision RI Connexion Services Pvt. Ltd.

India

12

60.5

Synergic Hydro (India) Pvt. Ltd.

India

13

58.4

Environment and Resources Management Services

Nepal

14

52.8

Advanced Engineering Associates International Inc.

USA

15

49.4

Islamic Countries Business Council

Pakistan

16

44.7

OMIC Tashkent LLC

Uzbekistan

17

31.0

RTS Global Consulting LLC

USA

18

19.0

Invedyn LLC

USA

 

The selection method has been announced as quality and cost based selection (QCBS). After evaluation of EOIs, the six consultants who obtained high EOI scores were shortlisted for further process:

After approval of long list to shortlist report approved, The RFP was sent to all shortlisted consultants on 01 March 2015, calling for full technical and financial proposals. Upon proposal submission deadline on 18 May 2015, the following consultants submitted their technical and financial proposals. The financial proposals remained sealed and unopened:

 

No.

Firm Name

Country of Origin

1

Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG

Germany

2

Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.

Korea, Republic of

3

SMEC International Pty. Ltd.

Australia

4

SM Developers

India

5

Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.

Pakistan

 

 

After the evaluation of Technical Proposals, each technical proposal was scored against categories already defined in the RFP, such as, consultant’s qualification, approach and methodology and proposed International and National key experts, table below indicates technical points that each proposal has received:

 

No.

Firm Name

Country of Origin

Technical Score

1

Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG

Germany

856.2

2

Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.

Korea, Republic of

868.1

3

SMEC International Pty. Ltd.

Australia

855.4

4

SM Developers

India

770.6

5

Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.

Pakistan

757

 

After Technical Evaluation Report has been approved, the price opening took place on 10 October 2015, and the prices of the five consulting firms were recorded:

 

No.

Firm Name

Country of Origin

Price at Opening (US$ Equivalent)

1

Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG

Germany

2,167,994

2

Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.

Korea, Republic of

2,250,275

3

SMEC International Pty. Ltd.

Australia

2,251,650

4

SM Developers

India

2,091,835

5

Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.

Pakistan

2,185,840

 

In the commercial evaluation, the prices have been adjusted due to arithmetical corrections, adjustment due to missing or reduced/increased items, the adjusted price for each proposal is determined:

 

No.

Firm Name

Adjusted Price (US$ Equivalent)

Price Score

1

Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG

2,167,994

960

2

Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.

2,250,222

921

3

SMEC International Pty. Ltd.

2,251,650

920

4

SM Developers

2,091,846

1000

5

Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.

2,185,840

951

 

Quality Cost ratio as described in the RFP is (technical: 0.9, price: 0.1), technical and price points and total evaluated points for each proposal is illustrated in the table below:

 

No.

Firm Name

Technical Points

Price Points

Total Points

Ranking

a

b

c = 0.9 x tech. score

d = 0.1 x price score

e = 3+4

f

1

Fichtner GmbH & Co.KG

770.62

96.03

866.65

2

2

Byucksan Power Co. Ltd.

781.25

92.08

873.34

1

3

SMEC International Pty. Ltd.

769.87

92.02

861.89

3

4

SM Developers

693.53

100.00

793.53

4

5

Indus Associated Consultants (Pvt) Ltd.

681.26

95.14

776.40

5